The purpose of this Policy and Procedure for Student Appeals of Final Course Grades is to establish a uniform and clear procedure for mediating and settling cases involving contested final grades assigned in undergraduate and graduate courses. This Policy and Procedure seeks to articulate and to protect both the rights of students for fair and impartial evaluation of their academic performance and the responsibilities of faculty members as the determiners of student grades.
Faculty Responsibility. It is a fundamental principle of higher education that faculty members are expected to exercise their professional judgment in evaluating student performance. At the same time, faculty members have the responsibility to specify in each of their courses at the beginning of the academic term: a) course requirements and expectations for academic performance; and b) procedures for evaluating performance (method(s) of evaluation and grading scales). Faculty members must also communicate clearly to all students in the course any subsequent additions to or changes in these requirements, standards, and procedures. Finally, faculty members have the responsibility to apply the specified grading criteria equitably to the academic performance of all students in the course regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, actual or perceived gender identity, age, national origin, physical or mental disability, political affiliation, veteran status, and genetic information.
Student Responsibility. Students have the responsibility to know and adhere to the University policies and standards pertaining to them. As students willingly accept the benefits of membership in the UNC Charlotte academic community, they are obligated to uphold and observe the principles and standards articulated in The UNC Charlotte Code of Student Academic Integrity and The UNC Charlotte Code of Student Responsibility.
A. Application. This Policy applies only to final course grades. However, this Policy is not applicable to appeals of course grades that result from alleged violations of University Policy 407, The Code of Student Academic Integrity; in such cases, the procedures set forth in the Code of Academic Integrity shall apply. A student alleging that the course grade assigned was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds due to sexual harassment by the instructor should follow the procedures set forth in University Policy 502 rather than those set forth here.
B. Arbitrary or Impermissible Grounds: For purposes of this Policy, a course grade is deemed to have been assigned upon arbitrary or impermissible grounds if, by a preponderance of the evidence, a student establishes that:
A course grade assigned in a manner consistent with University policy can be changed only by the instructor. University administrators can direct a grade to be changed only when it is determined through this procedure that the faculty member assigned the course grade based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds, as set forth in Section II.B of this Policy.
A student attempting to resolve a disagreement about a final course grade must first (Step 1) consult with the instructor and attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the student is unsuccessful at resolving the grade dispute and believes the grade was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds (see Section II.B), the student should then follow the procedure below in Step 2 to request an appeal of the course grade.
Step 1. Consultation with Instructor: When a student believes that a course grade is incorrect, the student shall first discuss it with the instructor who assigned the grade. This inquiry should occur as soon as possible after the formal grade report is received and no later than five business days after the first day of classes of the next regular academic semester. (For grades that were received during fall semester, the next regular academic semester is spring semester. For grades that were received during spring semester or a summer session, the next regular academic semester is fall semester.) The instructor will then explain how the grade was determined and attempt to resolve any disagreement with the student.
Step 2. Request for Appeal of Course Grade: If the student is unable to resolve the disagreement through consultation with the instructor, a written request for review of the course grade may be initiated.
Determine Basis for Appeal: Student disagreement with the assigned grade does not constitute a basis for review. Appeals only apply if the student believes the grade was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds, as set forth in Section II.B of this Policy.
Submit Appeal: Appeals are submitted to the Chair of the academic Department, Director of the academic program in which the course was taught, or designee. Written requests for review must be submitted within the first four weeks after the first day of class of the next regular academic semester. (For grades that were received during fall semester, the next regular academic semester is spring semester. For grades that were received during spring semester or a summer session, the next regular academic semester is fall semester.) Requests for review submitted after the deadline will be heard only in exceptional cases as determined by the Dean of the academic college or designee in which the appealed course grade occurred.
To initiate a grade review, the student should forward a written request for review of a final course grade to the Department Chair or Program Director in whose unit the course was offered. Students requesting a final course grade review assume the burden of proof. Therefore, the request for review must include:
The written request for review of a final course grade shall be accompanied by any evidence the student believes supports the conclusion that the grade was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds. Evidence might include papers, tests, syllabi, or written documentation from witnesses. The student must demonstrate that the instructor applied arbitrary or impermissible criteria in evaluating the student's academic performance, that the instructor failed to follow his or her course evaluation standards, or that the course grade was assigned as the result of a clear and material mistake in calculating or recording grades. Students can obtain advice from the Dean of Students or the student’s academic college on how to request a grade review.
CAUTION: Falsification or fabrication of information provided by the student may be subject to disciplinary action under University Policy 407, Code of Student Academic Integrity.
 The academic program is determined by the course prefix. In the case of courses with a LBST (Liberal Studies) prefix, students should submit the appeal to the Chair of the academic department with which the instructor is affiliated.
Step 3. Mediation by Department Chair or Program Director: Within ten business days of receiving the "Request for Review," the Department Chair or Program Director will attempt an informal resolution of the disagreement between the student and the instructor. The Chair or Program Director shall send written correspondence to the student notifying him or her of the resolution (or lack thereof). The correspondence shall include the rationale for the outcome and option for a next step in the process if appropriate. If the Chair or Director is unable to resolve the disagreement within ten business days, the Chair or Director shall forward the student's "Request for Review" to the Academic College Dean with a written statement of the Chair's or Director’s understanding of the facts.
Step 4. Initial Review by Academic Dean: Within five business days of the request and statement of the Chair or Director, the Dean should invite the student and instructor to submit any supplemental written statements relevant to the case. The student and instructor shall have five business days to submit any supplemental statements to the Dean. Within ten business days after receiving information from the Chair or Director, and any supplemental statements from the instructor and/or the student, if applicable, the Dean will review the written request for review of a final course grade and any supplemental statements. If the Dean determines that the facts alleged in the student’s written request for review of the final course grade or in the supplemental statement could, if true, constitute a violation of this Policy, the Dean, within ten business days, shall appoint an ad hoc "Grade Review Committee."
If the Dean concludes that the facts alleged by the student would not constitute a violation of this Policy, the Dean may dismiss the grade review by informing the student in writing of his/her decision. The written correspondence shall include the rationale for the decision and instructions for appeal of the decision. The decision of the Dean is final.
Step 5. Grade Review Committee: The ad hoc Grade Review Committee shall consist of three faculty members outside the department in which the grade was assigned who are appointed by the Dean of the discipline or program in which the course was taught. One of these three faculty members shall be named by the Dean to serve as chair of the Grade Review Committee.
The purpose of the Grade Review Committee is to determine whether the facts support the student's contention that the grade was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds, as set forth in Section II.B of this Policy. It is not the function of the Review Committee to reevaluate the student's work to determine whether the Committee agrees with the professional judgment of the faculty member who assigned the grade.
Within ten business days from his/her appointment, the Committee Chair shall convene the Committee to examine the student's written request for review, the factual report of the Departmental Chair or interdisciplinary degree program Director, any written statement received by the Academic Dean from either the student or the instructor, and any additional relevant documentation. Additionally, the Committee may request oral presentations from both parties. Witnesses may be questioned by Committee members and by the persons directly involved in the review.
The student and the Department Chair or Program Director may each be accompanied by one support person if desired, but that person’s role is limited to conferring with and advising the student or faculty member; the person is not permitted to argue or make statements on behalf of the individual. The Committee may consider only such evidence as is offered by the parties and at the hearing(s) and need consider only the evidence offered that it considers fair and reliable. The burden of proof shall be on the student to satisfy the Committee that a preponderance of the evidence supports a conclusion that the grade was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds, as set forth in Section II.B of this Policy. All decisions of the Committee shall be made by majority vote.
The conduct of the review shall be under the control of the Committee Chair. Within ten business days from the conclusion of its hearing(s) on the matter, the Committee will provide a formal, written report to the Academic Dean. The Committee report must include the Committee's finding as to whether or not the grade assigned was based on arbitrary or impermissible grounds, as set forth in Section II.B of this Policy. If such a determination is made, the Committee shall specify a recommended course of action, which could include assignment of a specific grade to replace the one originally assigned or implementation of some process to reevaluate the student's course work.
Step 6. Review by the Academic Dean: Within ten business days after receiving the Committee's report and recommendations and other documentation assembled in the review, the Dean will make a final decision on the appeal, which s/he will then communicate in writing to the student, faculty member, and the Department Chair or interdisciplinary degree program Director. The written communication to the student shall include the rationale for the decision and instructions for appeal of the decision to the Provost or designee.
Step 7. Final Appeal: An appeal to the Provost submitted by the student following Step 6 of this Policy will be considered only if the student is able to provide a reasonable basis to support the contention that the procedures prescribed in this Policy were not followed in the disposition of the student's request for review of a contested grade and that such procedural irregularities materially affected the outcome of the review. These appeals must be made in writing to the Provost within ten business days of the Dean's decision. The decision of the Provost is final. The Provost will send a letter to the student with the decision, including the rationale for that decision. If the Provost determines material procedural irregularities were present, the appeal will be returned to the Dean with instructions on how to proceed.
In the event that the faculty member whose grade is being reviewed is also a Department Chair or interdisciplinary degree program Director, the Dean shall do those things required by the Chair or Director in this Policy. In the event that the faculty member whose grade is being reviewed is also a Dean, the Provost shall name an appropriate substitute to perform the functions of the Dean as required by this Policy.
Responsible Office: Academic Affairs