|
Initially
approved December 9, 1994
Revised
December 8, 1995
Revised
June 7, 1996
POLICY
STATEMENT #9
RELATIONSHIPS
BETWEEN STUDENTS AND FACULTY MEMBERS OR OTHER UNIVERSITY
EMPLOYEES
This
policy statement sets forth the responsibilities of all
members of the faculty and all other employees of UNC
Charlotte with respect to establishing personal relationships
with students. It applies to all full- and part-time faculty
(tenure and non-tenure track), lecturers, and graduate
and undergraduate assistants, and all other employees.
I.
Policy
A.
Central to the educational mission of the University
is the establishment of close working relationships
between those who teach and those who learn. Although
such relationships are encouraged, it is improper and
professionally unethical for a faculty member, instructional
assistant, or other University employee to participate
in the instruction, evaluation, or supervision
of a student with whom there is an amorous relationship
or familial relationship.
In
this policy statement, to evaluate or supervise
means:
1. To assess, determine or influence
(a) one's academic performance, progress, or potential
or (b) one's entitlement to or eligibility for any
institutionally conferred right, benefit, or opportunity,
or
2. To oversee, manage or direct one's
academic or other institutionally prescribed activities.
In
this policy statement, an amorous relationship
exists when, without benefit of marriage, two persons
as consenting partners (1) have a sexual union or (2)
engage in romantic partnering or courtship that may or
may not have been consummated sexually. A familial
relationship exists when two persons are related by
blood, law, or marriage in any of the following ways:
1. Parent and child
2. Brother and sister
3. Grandparent and grandchild
4. Aunt and/or uncle and niece and/or nephew
5. First cousins
6. Step-parent and step-child
7. Step-brother and step-sister
8. Husband and wife
9. Parents-in-law and children-in-law
10. Brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law
11. Guardian and ward
Such amorous or familial relationships
may compromise instruction, evaluation, or supervision,
and thus may appear to create a conflict of interest for
the faculty, instructional assistant or other employee
involved. Such relationships are thus contrary to the
interests of the University, its faculty and students,
and the public which it serves.
B. It is misconduct, subject to disciplinary action,
for a University employee to engage in sexual activity
with any enrolled student of the institution, other
than his or her spouse, who is a minor below the age
of 18.
The University values and respects the privacy of its
students, faculty, and other employees, but it is improper
and professionally unethical for a University faculty
member, instructional assistant, or other employee to
simultaneously maintain an amorous or familial relationship
with a student, and have direct professional responsibility
for that student; one of the relationships must be terminated.
If the employee's professional responsibility for a
student is terminated, it must be done in such a way
as not to compromise the student's progress toward the
completion of his or her academic program. It is also
improper and professionally unethical for a faculty
member, instructional assistant, or other employee to
fail to withdraw from participating in activities or
decisions that may reward or penalize a student with
whom the employee has an amorous or familial relationship.
II. Implementation Procedure
Essential to the implementation of this policy is avoidance
of situations that may result in potential or actual
conflicts of interest. Accordingly, it is important
for members of the University community to be made aware
of their responsibilities under the policy. Such awareness
will be promoted by publication of the policy in the
Catalog
and in the Faculty
Handbook, and distribution in faculty and student
orientation sessions.
A. Self-Reporting Procedure.
Whenever a situation creates or appears to create a
conflict of interest under the policy, the faculty member
or other employee concerned shall report it promptly
to his or her department head, department chair or,
in the case of the chair, to the dean. The head, chair
or dean should take immediate and effective action to
ensure that the faculty or staff member will no longer
participate in the evaluation or supervision of the
student concerned and that there will be unconflicted
evaluation or supervision of the student without compromising
the student's progress toward the completion of his
or her academic program. Evaluative/supervisory situations
that may need attention include, but are not limited
to: faculty involvement in the evaluation of academic
performance; service on committees for academic awards
and prizes for which the student may be considered;
thesis supervision; and supervision of research and
teaching assistants. Deans should be kept fully informed
by chairs with respect to actions taken in response
to self-reported conflicts of interest under this policy.
B. Complaint Procedure. A
member of the University community who believes that
this policy governing employee-student relationships
has been violated may initiate a complaint through the
appropriate department head, department chair, the dean,
or the vice chancellor of the division in which the
University employee involved in the relationship is
employed. In the balance of the policy statement, that
vice chancellor is referred to as the "Administrator."
Complaints filed with chairs or deans will be forwarded
to the Administrator promptly for formal action.
1. Complaints should be in writing and must
be held in confidence. Disclosure concerning the existence,
source, or substance of a complaint will be solely at
the discretion of the Administrator and should be limited
to those who, in the interests of fair treatment and
elimination of the conflict of interest, have an immediate
need to know. Disciplinary action under the appropriate
policies concerning personal misconduct shall be taken
against any person bringing a malicious or frivolous
complaint in bad faith.
2. The Administrator will conduct a preliminary inquiry
to establish whether there is a reasonable basis for
believing that the policy has been violated. The Administrator
may conduct the inquiry directly or may ask one or
more administrators or faculty members (including
a dean and/or the department chair) to conduct the
investigation and prepare a report for the Administrator's
consideration. In any event, the Administrator bears
sole and complete responsibility for the final decision
and recommended disciplinary sanctions, if any.
3. In conducting the inquiry, the Administrator (or
designee) may interview the complainant, the faculty
or staff member and student concerned, and any other
person believed to have pertinent factual knowledge.
The Administrator (or designee) may also obtain any
University record deemed necessary to the inquiry
and may request from relevant parties or other sources
any documents or other information which will be of
assistance. The inquiry should:
a. Determine whether the reported relationship
exists in fact, is consensual in nature, and has created
an inappropriate conflict of interest;
b. Determine whether the faculty or staff member
has failed in his or her responsibility under this
policy to remove an inappropriate conflict of interest;
c. Explore and assist with options to end any inappropriate
conflict of interest, including the transfer of
responsibility for evaluating, supervising, or advising
the student;
d. Review the appropriateness of any academic decisions
made by the faculty or staff member that may have
been made when a conflict of interest existed; and
e. Afford the faculty or staff member a full opportunity
to respond to the complaint.
4. After having considered the evidence collected and
the report (if any) of a designated investigator(s),
the Administrator will prepare a written Preliminary
Report to the Chancellor which will describe the facts
and announce a preliminary decision as to whether this
policy has been violated. The faculty or staff member
will be provided a reasonable opportunity to review
and comment in writing upon the Preliminary Report.
5. After considering such response
to the preliminary decision as the faculty or staff member
may choose to make, the Administrator will reach a final
decision. The Administrator will:
a. Determine that the complaint is malicious or frivolous
and dismiss the complaint (see Section
7. concerning the disposition of records in such cases);
or
b. Determine that there is not sufficient factual basis
to support the allegation and dismiss the complaint
(see Section 7. concerning the disposition
of records in such cases); or
c. Conclude, using the procedures specified above,
that the matter can be resolved informally to the Administrator's
satisfaction through informal means and the elimination
of the conflict of interest prohibited by the policy;
or
d. Conclude that the policy has been violated and recommend
to the Chancellor or other appropriate administrator
that the faculty or staff member should be subject to
specific disciplinary sanctions. In determining whether
disciplinary sanctions are appropriate, the Administrator
shall consider such matters as the nature and length
of the faculty-student relationship during which a conflict
of interest could be said to exist, the number and significance
of decisions made by the faculty or staff member during
which the conflict existed, and evidence concerning
his/her willful violation and disregard of this policy.
6. Any sanction imposed for a violation
of this policy may be imposed only in accord with the
disciplinary procedure applicable to the faculty or staff
member's category of employment. Recommended sanctions
may include a letter of reprimand, suspension (with or
without pay), diminishment in rank, or discharge from
employment, depending upon the seriousness of the offense.
A faculty or staff member found to have violated the policy
may agree voluntarily to the imposition of an appropriate
sanction and the complaint will be resolved upon imposition
of the sanction. If the faculty or staff member does not
voluntarily agree to imposition of a sanction, the procedures
governing discharge from employment or the imposition
of serious sanctions applicable to his/her category of
employment will be observed.
7. Except for those actions which
result in the imposition of a sanction for violation
of this policy, no record of self-reported conflicts
under Section II.A. of this policy
or of complaints submitted under Section
II.B. will be kept as part of any faculty or staff
member's official personnel file.
In those cases in which the Administrator makes a determination
under Section 5.a. that the complaint
was frivolous or malicious, all records pertaining to
the inquiry will be destroyed except where necessary
to proceed with disciplinary action based upon a frivolous
or malicious complaint. In all other cases, records
will be forwarded by the Administrator to be held in
confidence by the Equal
Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Compliance
Officer for future reference by the Administrator
in the event that additional complaints are filed concerning
possible violations of this policy. The accused faculty
or staff member will receive a copy of the Administrator's
final report and any other documentation which will
be maintained in the official personnel file.
|